advertising dollars, the rush to create a WhoWhatWhy that has an article of "What the Media Didn't Warn you About." It does make a decent critique of the media coverage but veers close to paranoid conspiracy. The critique concerns the "narrative" that the media gives out during the blanket coverage of the bombing and its aftermath. The narrative according to the article in question states there several themes to this:
"scoop is stronger then ever. A case in point is the Boston Marathon bombing. I just read in a blog called
Worry, But Not Too Much
-Experts
-Scoops
-Repetition
-Kumbaya
-Substitute for Substance
Looking for a Conspiracy! |
Searching for More! |
A 2nd story that was barely covered was the HUGE fire and explosion at a Texas fertilizer plant. This event caused more deaths then at Boston but did not have the appeal of being in Boston and it happened to working-class stiffs at a Right to Work state. The plant was not inspected for 5 years since there have been cutbacks in funding for inspectors.
I did like this part of the article. It was well thought out and asks the right questions.
Under the Watchful Eye. |
Going Retro for Facts! |
While there is no confirmation yet on whether the blasts were the result of a terrorist attack, Stevenson said something he saw before the race was unusual.Well, we are off to the races my friends. Cue up Alex Jones and his "INFOWARS" and all the "False Flags" he likes to wave around. Just read this gem and be AFRAID be very AFRAID!
"At the starting line this morning, they had bomb sniffing dogs and the bomb squad out there," he said. "They kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed, that they were running a training exercise."
He added, "I've run a lot of races like this one, but I never saw bomb dogs at the starting line of any running event. It led me to believe that something like (a bomb detonation) might have happened."
Well, enough of my sarcasm and this write up about the media/conspiracy junk
No comments:
Post a Comment